(Treasury fiscal scientific research institute
"Today's observation" guest commentators)
Not only look at the factors (us $495) tax-free, just this one factor, it is not the better. If other factors under the condition of invariable, simple raising the cutoff point increase the consequences of words, first of all, the payment of individual income tax is the proportion of the social members will be decreased significantly. According to the original $2,000, of the cutoff point about 70% of working income levels don't pay individual income tax; If mention 3,000, other motionless, the time is about 80%; If mentioned, it may be five less than 10% of the people; If mentioned, then possibly all 8,000 China would have no several people pay individual income tax, because only a few percent of the members of society.
According to the regional differences in speaking, if this tax according to different areas to come to design different tax rates word, can appear what circumstance? So in real life, we find that a lot of people, you can't tell that the tax rate by which place Settings. If according to census register, also not recognized, such as household registration in Beijing, but the redeemed in henan, should according to henan to pay tax, also some people in a year, did the four areas where levied in accordance with? This is the real scheme design problems must be solved, now look still unanswered. As for family per capita income, this sounds quite reasonable some, some market economies and by this to collect, there is a specific design. But China's current management conditions to follow and follow? This is a realistic consideration, it needs to have a comprehensive, very specific information to judge this man's family support coefficients exactly is how much.
Jia kang: also should further strengthen the construction of system and mechanism of building
(Treasury fiscal scientific research institute "lobbychina guest commentators) today
Everybody must pay is hope tax fewer is better, more forthright speaking, if we use a referendum to decide the fate of the individual income tax, then it is likely that most people agree to cancel individual income tax calculate. But we need to look at the market economy of practice, any country would be so simple to handle the problem. We want to let as fully as possible different kinds of appeal expression comes out, have such a mechanism is very important. Because we are now to a modern state, the republican spirit essence is to make various opinions and demands are a necessary express channels and ways in this respect, we should also further strengthening the system construction and the mechanism of building.
ZhangHong: want to consider the burden of unequal. All
(the lobbychina commentators) today
Somebody calculated that if the cutoff point is more than eightmbt shoes sale thousand words, so may only 3% of them need to pay individual income tax. Actually this kind of dispute more is derived from everyone to the life burden itself such a different judge, we now comes back to their livelihoods deductions, life burden itself is first disequilibrium. Such as Shanghai 2010 worker month income is more than 3,800, then in Shanghai, most working class want pay individual income tax, but in other places, monthly income, a thousand or so everywhere, so might all qc. So to row, according to 3,000 in spite of the burden would be very heavy? Did it considering the uneven burden? So in some places will feel 3,000 about, in some places will feel 3,000 can also again upwards, such as 5,000, 8,000.
In fact now these are discussed in, because the current National People's Congress, and then the next review should openly for advice. These survey opinions are sufficient to participate in discussions, the discussion of the public to finally reasonable.
The state administration of higher income tax collection and fastened on tax justice mechanism, how to implement? Tibetan abound people idea how to establish?
Ricci: try to make worker pay an annual growth by 15%
(human resources and social security vice minister)
We try to make worker pay an annual growth 15%, so can still in "1025" period, realize double worker wage growth.
Jia kang: such adjustments that will make everyone GengGu some pocket
(Treasury fiscal scientific research institute
"Today's observation" guest commentators)
During the years of price rises, but actually MBT Panda, to consider low-end income purchasing power to hedge real income drop element, should also consider is, tax cuts in structural, we also should be under the concept of advancing with The Times to take into consideration how reduce the actual tax burden low-end, I think hedge rising prices and reduce tax factor is low comprehensive together account.
According to 1025 guidance is increasing household income,mbt sandals sale hope in the national income, while the proportion of inside once again stressed laborer in income in income can also improve. Gravity To achieve such a goal, will do a lot of concrete work. Now business department information is measuring down, if now said according to the preliminary program execution, and then RangDu 1,800 billion fiscal year to the personal income tax, about this part of income is to go to residents, so of course in the pocket will make everyone GengGu some.
ZhangHong: government should benefit to people
Finally realize people hide abound
(the lobbychina commentators) today
Low-income people with food prices rising tax pressure will certainly is more and more big, will tell from 1025 the whole planning, we must in the national income among the whole distribution to delimit structure, MBT Kisumu2, readjust distribution structure of time, will consider when personal structure plate getting too big, the other is must let a bit? This time the government's financial resources, increased, whether can conceded a bit? Now obviously is our RangDu, lower taxes in are actually meet now the whole economic development trends. Actually, also released the CPI figure, is unveiled a year-on-year growth in the first quarter fiscal revenue and 31%, is financial income continuous grew by more than 17 years of GDP. In recent years, when in 2009 is slightly
No comments:
Post a Comment